<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Software Technology Blog &#187; Adobe Flex</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.harbinger-systems.com/tag/adobe-flex/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.harbinger-systems.com</link>
	<description>Technology trends, design, delivery and Harbinger Systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 08:03:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0-beta1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comparing Adobe Flex and JavaScript for RIA development</title>
		<link>http://blog.harbinger-systems.com/2009/12/comparing-adobe-flex-and-javascript-for-html/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.harbinger-systems.com/2009/12/comparing-adobe-flex-and-javascript-for-html/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 18:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Webmaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe Flex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flex Javascript comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rich internet applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0 Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.3.81:82/wordpress-2.9/?p=40</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We released a white paper comparing Adobe Flex and JavaScript. Both are leading technologies available today for creating rich internet applications (RIA). In this paper, we compare these from the standpoint of their compatibility with existing technologies, UI capability, feature richness, performance and development support.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float:right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.harbinger-systems.com%2F2009%2F12%2Fcomparing-adobe-flex-and-javascript-for-html%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.harbinger-systems.com%2F2009%2F12%2Fcomparing-adobe-flex-and-javascript-for-html%2F&amp;style=normal&amp;hashtags=Adobe+Flex,Flex+Javascript+comparison,rich+internet+applications,Web+2.0+Development&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><span style="font-size:100%;">We released a white paper <a href="http://www.harbinger-systems.com/tech-articles/software-dev-company-info-form.htm?code=HSTW106">comparing Adobe Flex and JavaScript</a>. Both are leading technologies available today for creating rich internet applications (RIA). In this paper, we compare these from the standpoint of their compatibility with existing technologies, UI capability, feature richness, performance and development support.<br />
</span></p>
<g:plusone href="http://blog.harbinger-systems.com/2009/12/comparing-adobe-flex-and-javascript-for-html/"  size="standard"   ></g:plusone></script>
<span style=''><g:plusone count="true" size="tall"></g:plusone></span><p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.harbinger-systems.com%2F2009%2F12%2Fcomparing-adobe-flex-and-javascript-for-html%2F&amp;title=Comparing%20Adobe%20Flex%20and%20JavaScript%20for%20RIA%20development" id="wpa2a_2"><img src="http://blog.harbinger-systems.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.harbinger-systems.com/2009/12/comparing-adobe-flex-and-javascript-for-html/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

